• Last Update 2022-12-03 08:55:00

President says he do not wish to create a beggar nation

News

 

President Ranil Wickeremsinghe said that he does not like to re create a beggar nation.

He expressed his views while addressing the crowd while attending Lalith Athulathmudali Commemorative oration held yesterday.

He said that the country needs to go ahead without begging. “We can't be going to countries and asking for loans anymore. We have to learn to stand on our own feet”. He said.

President pointed out that when India fell in 1991, they decided to come up by themselves. China destroyed by the Cultural Revolution and Deng Xiaoping decided that he’ll bring it up. Germany, destroyed by war with the atom bomb decided to come up by themselves. However Sri Lanka is getting aid all the time.

 He said that people should make up their minds to build this economy, and added that is possible, even though they would not achieve it over night.

President also explained that they are aiming to sustain a growth in the economy in five years  

The full speech

I was thinking way back when I first met with Mr. Lalith  Athulathmudali when he was a lawyer and a lecturer at the Law College and  I was an apprentice under Mr. H. W. Jayawardena, before I took oath. The day I took oath I also invited Lalith to come to my oath party, another person I invited was another young lawyer older than me and a member of Parliament Gamini Dissanayake. I had two other members of Parliament I invited since I knew them. One was the Chief Opposition Whip, Mr. R. Premadasa and finally, the Leader of the Opposition Mr. J. R. Jayawardene.

 

I think the destiny of the country and the destiny of the UNP was to a large extent tied in the interaction between all these members. Lalith, like me and Gamini, was eager to see a modernized UNP. Now, why did I join? My family has been UNP from the start.

 

But what attracted me as a modern UNPer was  what was called the Kalutara Declaration of the 1963 UNP Convention which was a draft done by Dudley Senanayake  and J. R. Jayawardena which laid the ground for a  social democracy.

 

We had envisaged as a party from the time of Mr. D. S Senanayake for a capitalist economy and the fact that we wanted to do away with hunger, illiteracy, and disease. That was in 1947.

 

It was about the time that this concept of a social democracy was started in Germany with the then member in charge of finance Ludwig Erhard and his miracle and also the Chancellor Konrad Adenauer.  That's how we began.  And the parties got together at that time and started their own foundations later, to promote it, of which the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom (FNF) were the representatives of the Liberals. But we were attracted by this and the fact that President Jayawardene as leader, the opposition was for more bolder reforms of opening out the market and establishing an executive presidency to give this stability to this country for development.

 

So we came along, I think, yes, both Lalith and I entered the working committee at the same time in 1973 when Mr. Jayawardena took over the leadership and he went to become organizer for Agalawatte. So we took part in the campaigns and we used to meet quite often, so did Gamini.  I remember in 1976, the whole social democracy was again restated more forcefully by President Jayawardhana as the Leader of the Opposition and Leader of the UNP at the party convention in 1975 or 76.

 

So there was a lot of studies done, I must say, while I used to discuss this with Lalith and with Gamini. There were other circles also actually the Hon. speaker and I belong to another centre of studies what is called the Liberal Club or liberal Centre, which really was organized by late Mr. Cyril Matthew and was also discussing the same issues so it was rife in the UNP to discuss how we do it.

 

And  former president Premadasa and another group that was also studying this. All this came together after we came to power and the idea of both the executive presidency and the open economy and the  social democracy was envisaged even in our constitution.

 

We were a socialist democracy at that time which was  the controlled  economy under Mrs. Bandaranaike. To make it different in the Constitution. President Jayawardena insisted those some of us argued against it that we must call ourselves the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, and that we were not a socialist democracy, but we were practicing democratic socialist. So you see that in the preamble to the Constitution, but more so, he established in the directive principles of state policy by saying that I read those relevant parts of Article 27-2.

 

The realization by all citizens of an adequate standard of living for themselves and their families, including adequate food, clothing and housing.

 

The continuous improvement our living conditions and the full enjoyment of leisure and social and cultural opportunities.

 

The rapid development of the whole country by means of public and private economic activity and by laws prescribed being such planning and control as may be expedient for directing and coordinating such public and private economic activity towards social objectives and the public feel

 

The equitable distribution among all citizens of the material resources of the community and the social product so as to best sub serve  the common good.

 

The establishment adjust social order in which the means of production, distribution and exchange are not concentrated and centralized in the state, state agencies or in the hands of a privileged few, but are dispersed among and owned by all the people of Sri Lanka

 

Then Article 27, which had 8,

 

 The State shall ensure that the operation of the economic system does not result in the concentration of wealth and the means of production to the common detriment.

 

So this is the framework that is still there in our Constitution. But it has to pass the test of time.As we opened up the economy, which are done by the Minister of Finance, the next most important part was trade. The trade was given over to Lalith. Later on, shipping was added that the other major project, which are to be the impetus for development were,  one was going to be the  greater Colombo Economic Zone with the President kept for himself and the other one was the Mahaweli program which had given to Gamini Dissanayake.  that is how we started. Lalith's job was trade.

 

It didn't have the flash of the  other jobs, but nevertheless it was important. And he opened up the trade the Greater Colombo Economics. At that time we were a socialist economy, everything was controlled and President Jayawardena want to go decided to proceed cautiously. And what did he do? He took seven electorates in the Gampaha District stareting from Negombo and ending with Biyagama where the normal laws of open market economy, were applied and special concession were given in the two investment zones of Katunayake and Biyagama.

 

But Lalith realized that we can't get export only from those areas. We need to have the rest of the country. Therefore, he started the Export Development Board to promote exports outside the economic zone. The major laws he passed like intellectual property companies, those I am not going to refer to here, but another major development was he identified the need for logistics and for ports.

 

So he undertook the development of Sri Lanka's main port, the Colombo port. So you are getting in that two big areas of development around Colombo. On one side was Colombo, the trading hub, and Colombo, the port connected to Colombo was on the other side, the Greater Colombo Economic Zone and then into the rural areas came this massive development program which really developed the north central province, parts of east and the whole of the Kandy district.

 

So these were the driving forces of growth that went along .then as it went on., I was then the Minister of Education Lalith  came up with this idea of scholarships for those who want to go for the university. So you had the Mahapola scholarship. It is the first time that we funded the individuals for free education and not the institutes.

 

Unfortunately, we didn't carry it through with our institutes. And you have, the universities which are today taking money direct from the government and which have not developed, unfortunately, structured around the UGC. I think we have to rethink of that all mechanism rather than the countries which funded the student who funded the universities and therefore the courses had to be employment oriented.

 

Today, part employment oriented. Then you have people in the arts faculty who hasn't  and then those students, some of them have to be found employment, which we could do. But in addition, the university run their external courses so they are external students and every year we had to take in about additional 10,000 people which contribute to the 500,000 excess in the government service.

 

So anyway, he started the Mahapola scheme to go ahead. So these are what we have to learn of the changes that we have to do now, keeping free education and making it more meaningful. Then came Lalith's next stint  as the Minister of Agriculture where he started modernizing the villages and looking at modernizing agriculture and looking at exports and then his stint  as the Minister of Education.

 

Another one in the picture is Lalith as the Minister on national security. Much had been said of this, so I will not cover that. I will looking at the contribution he had made both to the economy and to the development of Sri Lanka. It was then in 1991 that we all parted ways. Lalith decided he will leave the UNP and I thought that I will stay with the UNP.

That the party mattered and the party had to be strengthened. He felt there had to be change and that he had to go out. And then the politics of Sri Lanka took a different, state altogether. By 1993, Lalith was assassinated. That was a great loss to the country. Within a week, President Premadasa  was assassinated. And by the end of next year, Gamini was no more.

 

So the drivers of the development, the people who were to shape the country were no longer there. And then we had to look at a new phase. By that time, the world was also changing. The whole concept of social democracy had gone  further forward. And it was known then as what we call today a social market economy.

 

And the social market economy was taken in by the European Union from Germany it was also practiced in different ways. Germany. It was called the Rising Capitalism. It was practice in, Scandinavia, in Netherlands, in Austria and in Belgium. And they were fast growing economies. And what is the social market economy? They have so many definitions.

 

But a common definition was what was taken into the Treaty of the European Union. Where in the Mastrich  and the Lisbon Treaty, where Defined as the union shall establish an internal market and it shall work for the sustainable development of Europe based on balance, economic growth and price stability in a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and social progress, and a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment.

 

It shall promote scientific and technological advance. So that is what we call a social market economy in this period of time. The UNP also took on the definition of a social market economy and the social market economy also form the basis of the International Democratic Union, of which we are member of the centre party. Basically centre-Right parties or parties of the right.

 

The one party that didn't accept it couldn't stay in the European Union, the Conservatives, and they have left the Union and they are now trying to find a way forward. But this is what we have accepted and this is what we have to go ahead. So when I became president, it was partly because we didn't follow Lalith's advice. He said  you export or perish.

 

We didn't export, so the economy perished. Now, the whole issue was how do you restart it again? What is the type of economic model? Are we going in with a completely open new liberal model or something else? So I thought we should stay on with the social market economy and defining it should be vibrant. It has to be vibrant.

 

It cannot be otherwise. And we developed what was relevant for today, a highly competitive economy with social protection. So the economy has to be highly competitive, highly competitive globally. Then it had to be an export oriented economy. So we we've included in that for the first time what Lalith said, export or perish. And we brought in an issue which was not important that time lalith was living or the others. But today, climate change and environmental friendly, green and blue economy, the green and blue economy, a word that was given to us by the late Mangala Samaraweera  at that time, And finally, what Lalith  again laid ground for and what I also work for and what we did to the digital economy So it's a highly competitive economy, which is export oriented, which has social protection which is environmentally friendly, and the characteristics is a blue green economy.

 

It doesn't apply to the government of today, and a digital economy. So this is what we have. Now we have to go ahead. We can't be begging anymore. We can't be going to countries and asking for loans anymore. We have to learn to stand on our own feet. When India fell in 1991, I was the Minister of Industries at that time, they decided to come up by themselves. China destroyed by the Cultural Revolution and Deng Xiaoping  decided that he’ll bring it up. Germany, destroyed by war with the atom bomb decided to come up by themselves. Now what the hell we are doing Getting aid all the time. When I was the  Prime Minister in 2015.

 

I was wondering now how do we have a happy that at least with the primary budget surplus you can't go like this. I certainly don't like to recreate a beggar nation. In fact to have 80 billion what 50 $60 billion of debt coming from a family which in for three, four or five generations thought you shouldn't get into debt What do I do.

 

.So we must now in our own effort to get back that no other way and we can do it we must aim high. We can't aim low. So we are looking at a 25 year program. Many of us won't be there when it ends. But we are 100 in 2048 When we started in 1948, I was born in 49, we were second to Japan. Today we are just above Afghanistan. Now where are we going So let us make up our mind that we are going to build this economy and we can do it.

 

It's a open market economy, highly competitive. It won't come overnight. Gradually over a period of five years will build up our competition. We must aim after the five years to sustain a growth of 7%. Easier said than done, but it can be done and international trade as a percentage of GDP must equal 100 or more. We are not doing it overnight, but certainly  over 5- 6 years, which we have to do.

 

And annual growth rate from new exports should be $3 billion. Investment annually must be $3 billion and we have to create a internationally competitive workforce, highly educated and highly skilled. It has to be employable skills, not otherwise. So all this is what we have to aim at and we have to go for it. Then what what is it? Before that, we have to stabilize the economy.

 

So we started that process at 2023 our fiscal stabilization program envisages, the government revenue increasing to around 15% of GDP by 2025 and from the present 8.3% at the end of 2023. If you look at a economy with social protection, I think our revenue will have to go beyond that to about 18% of the GDP.

 

But that can take another five years. We need that. We have to do it. Then we are looking at a primary surplus of more than 2% in 2025.

 

We are to improve there after we have to reduce the public sector debt from 110% of the GDP to 100% of the GDP in the medium term. We have to bring inflation under control and a single digit and interest rates I presume have peaked and will gradually come down to a moderate and a single digit level.

 

And the exchange rate in this will  become stable and strong with this has to come the growth enhancing structural reforms. So we are not looking at the four years for the stabilization program and the modernization afterwards is running to get there. It's supposed to start next year but we've already started getting the stabilization program and starting the structural reforms also at the same time.

 

So this is where we are and one wish on the structural reforms because my friend honourable Charitha Herath had raised it in the debate. Unfortunately, I was  not in the chamber to reply. Yes as the policy, we accept that the government should not be running businesses full stop. Except one which is an exception, we will stay in the financial sector, we will build the banks we own and make it stronger, but it will be run like any good commercial bank and we don't mind giving a part to the minorities shares to the deposit holders, amongst others.

 

It will bring some discipline in. So the financial sector. Yes, well, you control it with the financial sector. Not with the water's edge or the Hilton Hotel. That is secondary. So we will keep building on our financial sectors we don't mind helping out in the technology sectors. The digital economy will have to have some investments there. But the rest, yes, we have tried everything.

 

We tried state ownership. We have tried mixed economies. We tried to run it with corporations, that trillion of rupees that we have lost and we made us poorer than we were in 2019. So that is what we are going to do. And when you look at the future, one of the biggest new areas of development is Sri Lanka as a logistics centre. Sri Lanka, that can be a feeder to most of the Asian countries, a transhipment hub first is the Colombo port.

 

Now we have got the south port very soon. We will have investment for the east terminal. And when that is full, the next project we are working on will be the north port, which will take all the way up to Ja-Ela   making the largest port. And from Ja-Ela  only five miles away to the airport, you get a Air sea hub naturally.

 

Then Hambantota another port, which can we reach out to Africa and Trincomalee on the eastern side of the Indian Ocean. So here we are. This is what we have and we have we are starting at that. Now that is what Lalith started. Secondly, large scale modernization of agriculture with small or whether it big we have to modernize agriculture.

 

Which will aid the large rural areas increase our paddy production. We have a big market for export. The Middle East which requires food. Singapore, which requires food and many other growing market. There would be at least 500 million more people from Saudi Arabia to Indonesia by 2050 not counting the hundreds of millions on East Africa and South Africa there your big market for food to develop.

 

So that's the area we are looking at highly automated manufacturing because Lower-Wage economies will be in Bangladesh, Myanmar and even in India. We have to be jump ahead. Our tourist industry has to now reorient itself to high level tourism. We can't have 10 million tourists coming in paying $100 $150 a night. It's better to have 2 million tourists at $502,000 a night.

 

So we have to get used to that. We have manufacturing. Certainly, the whole I.T. sector digitalization and of course, there's new potential in  renewable energy. I are totally renewable energy capacity. We are in a competitive both in the north and in the south is now being estimated that anything close to 30 gigawatts, 40 gigawatts and some are going even further think  by next year with the help of the ADB will be able to estimate the amount, which means we don't need all that you convert all that to green hydrogen, the sooner we move on it, the better it is.

 

That's the big opportunity that will people find other services that will come up as the economy moves. But we have to go ahead. And when doing that I have another matter in mind for a social market economy, that is the promotion of the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may, a social order in which justice, social, economic, political shall guide all institutions and nationally, this is important.

 

These are part of our directive principles. Remember who are suffering most in this crisis. The ordinary people, the small and medium entrepreneurs, they are the ones who are suffering. They can't get away. They are stuck. Some of them are having one meal a day and some of them are having two meals a day. Their children are missing out on some opportunities for education.

 

Now, are we going to keep them at the bottom of the file of the pack when we recover? Are you going to have like what happened in some countries a small number of rich people, a large number of affluent people, and even a large number of poor people the middle class has been destroyed. We are to rebuild the middle class.

 

So what I'm suggesting is that to ensure that we reach our  target, that we get all aspects of the different segments of society workers, farmers, owners, employers all together into having a big social contract. We will discuss this. The policy that we are going to follow, the economic framework is that we want the social contract to take place in that while we get different agencies chambers of commerce,  and all the average persons must also have a voice. In that we have agreed to a good superb idea by the former speaker, Hon. Karu Jayasuriya to start 'Jana Sabhas' where  people can give their opinion on different matters so let it reach the grassroot. We must commit to the next 25year. This is our policy. We are not going to change it. And this is the benefit the country can receive.

 

Secondly, we will legislate for the Social Justice Commission, which can go into matters and keep reporting back from time to time.

 

So let's see how we can build this society. Last time when Lalith, Gamini, Premadasa, Jayawardene, all of us started, it was derailed by a war. I don't think there is going to be a war in the country but the consequent, the after effects has to be actually rectified. And we decided after the budget debate is over in the following week that the party leader and the Speaker will meet and the Government to discuss how we can resolve the outstanding issues.

 

We have talked on this and finish there. Nothing more I mean then nothing more to write from 1983 deal last year there are enough of reports you reported it to go. It would be to go far beyond that you can put another multi-storeyed building by just putting those up is going to question not sitting down and deciding this is what we are going to do.

 

This is the deal that we are going to do. So that's that's what I hope we can do and we have to have stability in this country law and order and stability. But those who some others will lose but fortunately unfortunately the United National Party is one that believes in law and order and stability without law and order and stability there can be growth, but it has to be done ensuring that human rights, the fundamental rights in the Constitution are available to all citizens so this is, in my view, in this process that we are going to launch. It's a  question of what you are going to do, how we participate, if we have any other option.

 

Certainly I don't mind looking at a viable option. If not, let's get together and then in that background, we can build up the new institutions. Lalith always told me that you want to build a university and now Ravi told me that they want to do it. All right. Right. Ravi, the government will join you in having a postgraduate university and a Mahapola university to honour Lalith Athulathmudali.

 

So that one thing we can all work together if you remember a large number of people who have graduated, thanks to what Lalith has done, so let's work together both for the University and for a better Lanka, where those who graduate, those who post-graduate degrees from that university can exist. 

You can share this post!

Comments
  • Still No Comments Posted.

Leave Comments