Transparency International Sri Lanka (TISL) welcomed the introduction of a new Structural Benchmark in the IMF’s Third Review Agreement, addressing gaps in implementing the Asset Declarations system under the Anti-Corruption Act of 2023.
This is a significant step toward ensuring public access to asset declarations—a long-standing reform for which TISL has strongly advocated, the anti-corruption watchdog said in a statement.
"The benchmark requires the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) to remove excessive redactions, disclose bank balances and other asset values, improve accessibility, publish non-filers’ names, include Beneficial Ownership details in declaration forms, and enact a comprehensive Asset Recovery Law in line with UNCAC obligations. While this progress is welcome, it highlights a broader concern—government institutions often prioritize procedural compliance over meaningful reform,"
Weak governance and corruption were key contributors to Sri Lanka’s economic collapse, yet accountability remains lacking when governance-related commitments are not effectively implemented. Critical transparency and anti-corruption reforms risk being delayed or diluted without structured oversight and meaningful public engagement, the statement said.
Without genuine public participation, governance reforms risk becoming ineffective. TISL calls on the government to establish a structured, transparent mechanism for civil society engagement in governance reforms, particularly within International Financial Institution led programs such as the IMF agreement. This mechanism must go beyond ad-hoc consultations and ensure that reforms are developed, implemented, and monitored with input from the public and civil society organizations, reflecting real-world challenges and needs. An open, participatory approach will not only strengthen reform outcomes but also build public trust in the process.
TISL urges International Financial Institutions to institutionalize civil society participation, ensuring governance reforms are not reduced to box-ticking exercises. Just as macroeconomic targets are rigorously assessed, governance commitments must be subject to the same level of scrutiny.
Upcoming reforms on proceeds of crime, public procurement, and beneficial ownership transparency must be implemented in ways that guarantee genuine progress. The strength of Sri Lanka’s economic recovery will not be determined by financial restructuring alone but by its commitment to accountability, open governance, and the rule of law.
Leave Comments